Methods and Apparatus for Filtering Video Packets for Large-Scale Video Stream Monitoring

ABSTRACT

A method of filtering video packets for video stream monitoring is provided. A video packet of a video stream is received. One or more features are extracted from a specified frame of the video packet via one or more histograms and frequency domain coefficients of the specified frame. One or more concept detectors are implemented on the one or more features creating one or more confidence values. The confidence values are transmitted to a display module for filtering of video packets.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION(S)

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No.11/173,124 filed on Jul. 1, 2005, the disclosure of which isincorporated herein by reference.

STATEMENT OF GOVERNMENT RIGHTS

This invention was made with Government support under Contract No.: TIAH98230-04-3-0001 awarded by U.S. Dept. of Defense. The Government hascertain rights in this invention.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to large-scale video streammonitoring systems and, more particularly, to techniques for filteringvideo packets through feature extraction for large-scale video streammonitoring.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The monitoring of information from large-scale video streams presentsseveral challenging problems. For example, an ideal monitoring systemprovides the ability to process a large amount of data, while alsoproviding an understanding of the semantic content of the data inreal-time. After processing and understanding the data, the monitoringsystem uses these results to filter the information.

Examples of situations in which it is desirable to provide aninformation monitoring system that achieves such goals may include, forexample, the monitoring of foreign military or political activitiesthrough hundreds of live broadcasting video channels; the monitoring ofactivities and context of hundreds of video cameras mounted on cars orsoldiers; and the monitoring of Internet traffic to determine whethermovies are being illegally distributed. The semantic content that isrequired to be understood in these examples may include, for example,the mentioning of political leader activities on foreign broadcastingnews, the type of scene a soldier is viewing, and the type of videobeing played through an Internet source.

Traditional indexing and semantic content detection techniques developedfor databases are not easily extendible to the dynamic nature of videostreams. However, recently, real-time stream information classificationhas received greater attention on other modalities, such as, forexample, email activities, chat room monitoring, and voice over Internetprotocol (VoIP) monitoring, due to the inherent challenges regardingclassification and information routing speed.

Traditional approaches to large-scale video stream monitoring haverelied on storage-and-process techniques, which have associatedlimitations. For example, once the data amount, CPU power or CPU memoryreaches a certain threshold, these systems may break down entirely.Therefore, it is desirable to have an improved system filtertransmission video packets based on the semantic content at a fasterspeed under various resource constraints.

A semantic routing tree has been used to route signal-level informationon a resource-constrained sensor network, see, for example, S. Madden etal., “The Design of an Acquisitional Query Processor for SensorNetworks,” SIGMOD, San Diego, Calif., June 2003. Routing is based on thesignal properties and predefined decision trees. However, multimediastreaming data has content that is more difficult to detect and filter.Even in the raw video data domain without any resource constraint, videosemantics detection remains an open issue, see, for example, A. Amir, etal., “IBM Research TRECVID-2003 Video Retrieval System,” NIST TREC-2003,November 2003.

In large-scale video streams scenarios, the targeted video content maystream at speeds in a range of approximately tens of gigabytes ofmultimedia per second. An ideal system is able to conduct semanticcontent detection of the video streams in real-time. Unfortunately,existing systems are unable to provide the streaming video bandwidthnecessary for routing multimedia data to the classifiers, and are alsounable to achieve real-time semantic content detection.

Therefore, a novel semantic filtering system that can be applied tolarge-scale content monitoring is desired that reduces the amount oftransmission loads through filtering of video content packets based onsemantic detection.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides techniques for filtering video streampackets for video stream monitoring. More specifically, the embodimentsof the present invention provide techniques for extracting features fromvideo packets of a video stream for filtering purposes. Thus a novelsemantic filtering system is provided that can be applied to large-scalevideo stream monitoring. The semantic filtering system reduces theamount of transmission loads through filtering video content packetsbased on semantic detection. A set of novel video features are utilizedthat result in better performance.

For example, in one aspect of the present invention, a method offiltering video packets for video stream monitoring is provided. A videopacket of a video stream is received. One or more features are extractedfrom a specified frame of the video packet via one or more histogramsand frequency domain coefficients of the specified frame. One or moreconcept detectors are implemented on the one or more features creatingone or more confidence values. The confidence values are transmitted toa display module for filtering of video packets.

In an additional embodiment of the present invention, a method ofextracting features from video packets for filtering purposes isprovided. A video packet is parsed to attain a specified frame. Ahistogram is calculated for each of one or more slices of the specifiedframe using frequency domain coefficients of the specified frame. Afeature vector of the specified frame is created based on the one ormore calculated histograms.

The histogram may be calculated by determining frequency domaincoefficients of the specified frame. The specified frame is partitionedinto one or more slices and selected frequency domain coefficients aretruncated in each of the one or more slices of the specified frame. Ahistogram of the frequency domain coefficients for each of the one ormore slices of the specified frame is calculated.

A semantic filtering framework is provided for large-scale monitoring ofvideo streams, which is capable of simultaneously monitoring the contentof multiple video streams being transmitted over the Internet (or aproprietary network), handling tens of gigabytes of multimedia data persecond. A mechanism alters the accuracy of classification with thecomplexity of execution; thus avoiding system failure during periods ofoverload. A set of novel video features is provided that perform betterthan previous semantic classifiers. This system is also capable ofclassifying over a hundred concepts.

These and other objects, features and advantages of the presentinvention will become apparent from the following detailed descriptionof illustrative embodiments thereof, which is to be read in connectionwith the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a flow diagram illustrating a streaming video semanticfiltering methodology, according to an embodiment of the presentinvention;

FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating a feature extraction methodology,according to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 3 is a graph illustrating a performance comparison of theembodiments of the present invention and IBM visual concept models;

FIG. 4 is a graph illustrating a complexity-accuracy curve with reducedfeature vector dimensionality, according to an embodiment of the presentinvention;

FIG. 5 is a graph illustrating a complexity-accuracy curve with fewersupport vectors (SVs), according to an embodiment of the presentinvention; and

FIG. 6 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary hardwareimplementation of a computing system in accordance with which one ormore components/methodologies may be implemented, according to anembodiment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

As will be illustrated in detail below, the present invention introducestechniques for extracting features from a specified frame of a videopacket for filtering of video packets in a video stream monitoringsystem.

Referring initially to FIG. 1, a flow diagram illustrates a streamingvideo semantic filtering methodology, according to an embodiment of thepresent invention. A video stream is fed into the system, preferably ata rate of approximately 60 megabytes per second (mbps). This system mayhandle TV broadcasts, VCR cassettes, DVDs, video file databases, andwebcam inputs. The video stream undergoes encoding in block 102 fortransformation to MPEG-1 or MPEG-2 format, preferably at approximately1.5 mbps. The MPEG is fed into feature extraction processing elements(PEs) as well as display controller 114. It is not necessary for thefeature extraction PEs and display modules to reside on the samemachine.

In the feature extraction PEs, the MPEG is first fed into a GOPextraction block 104 where groups of pictures (GOPs) are extracted.These GOPs are transmitted, preferably, for example, at approximately320 kilobytes per second (kbps), to a feature extraction block 106 wherefeatures are extracted from the GOPs. These features are preferablytransmitted at approximately 22.4 kbps to a shot segmentation block 108,which results in compressed-domain slice (CDS) features.

The feature extraction PEs extract and send the CDS features to a servermachine 110, which may implement, for example, approximately one hundredconcept detectors. The CDS features are preferably sent at a rate ofapproximately 2.8 kbps. These concept detectors may include elementssuch as face, female, male, outdoors, indoors, airplane, chair, etc. Inthis embodiment of the present invention, a control module 112 is usedto match user interests with a confidence output of semantic modelvectors. Then, confidence values resulting from this matching are storedas metadata and sent back to display module 114 to filter the content.However, many different techniques may be utilized for concept detectionusing semantic classifiers.

A PE is an independent executable thread which has specific ports forinput and output streams. Thus, PEs can be distributed in differentmachines. In this embodiment of the present invention, GOP extractionblock 104, feature extraction block 106 and shot segmentation block 108are included on the client machine, which may reside in a smart cameraor an edge router in the network. There can be tens of such distributed(and parallel) clients sending feature packets to the distributed serverclassifiers. For each shot, a CDS feature packet, which is less than1.4K bits, is sent to a server router which multicasts these featurepackets to the classifier PEs. Because the feature rate is less than 2.8kbps, the transmission load is only 56 kbps if the server PEs needs toclassify 200 video streams simultaneously. Even if all classifier PEsare placed in one machine, a regular Pentium 2.4 GHz with a 1 GB RAMserver can deal with 40 concurrent incoming streams in real-time withone hundred concept detectors.

A new CDS feature set is proposed that results in better accuracy ofconcept classifiers with a shorter extraction time, compared to, forexample, A. Amir, et al., and C.-Y. Lin et al., “VideoAL: End-to-EndSystem MPEG-7 Video Automatic Labeling System,” ICIP 2003, Barcelona,September 2003. The reduction in computational load is significant: fora typical 320×240 MPEG-1 video stream, a decoder needs about 2 millionmultiplications to decode an I-frame. Also, the algorithms in A. Amir etal. and C.-Y. Lin et al. require complex region/object segmentation andcompute 12 sets of features. Feature selection of previous systems wasabout 3 times slower than real-time, which provided the bottleneck forreal-time large-scale implementations.

Referring now to FIG. 2, a flow diagram illustrates a feature extractionmethodology, according to an embodiment of the present invention. Thismay be considered a detailed description of the steps taken in thefeature extraction PEs as shown above with regard to FIG. 1. Themethodology begins in block 202, where a video packet is parsed toattain a specified frame. The video packet may be, for example, anMPEG-1 or MPEG-2 packet in this embodiment of the present invention. Thespecified frame is preferably the beginning of an I-frame or the closestI-frame of a pre-specified shot key frame. An I-frame is a full framethat does not need information from the frame before or the frame afterin order to play properly. Thus, an I-frame is a key frame or referencevideo frame that acts as a point of comparison to p-frames and b-framesand is not rebuilt from another frame.

In block 204, a frequency domain coefficient of the specified frame isdetermined. The frequency domain coefficient is preferably determined byusing variable length code (VLC) maps to map VLCs of the specified frameto discrete cosine transform (DCT) coefficients. In block 206, thespecified frame is partitioned into two or more slices. Preferably, theframe is partitioned into three slices. In block 208, a histogram of theDCT coefficients is calculated for each of the slices of the specifiedframe.

Finally, in block 210, a feature vector of the specified frame iscreated based on the calculated histograms, terminating the methodology.Preferably the histograms from three DCT coefficients on each colorplane are used. DCT coefficients are divided into a DC coefficient,which is a coefficient with zero frequency in both directions, and ACcoefficients, which are the remaining coefficients with non-zerofrequencies. In an embodiment of the present invention, the three DCTcoefficients include the DC coefficient and two lowest frequency ACcoefficients on each color plane, Y, Cb and Cr, forming a576-dimensional feature vector.

In the above methodology, it is evident that no multiplication operationis required to produce these feature vectors. Only addition is requiredfor calculating the histogram. As in A. Amir et al., a support vectormachine (SVM) is used to train models and classification. Fusion ofdifferent sets of features (color, edge, motion, and texture) is an openissue, which is also application-dependent. Complicated (feature orclassifier) fusion does not necessary lead to better results. These CDSfeatures may be considered an early-fusion method for classification.

It should be determined whether specific types of classifiers canperform relatively well under all kinds of resource constraints, becausemany classification systems may not be able to do so. A training set{(x₁, y₁)}, (x₂, y₂), . . . , (x_(N), y_(N)) is provided, where x_(i)εXdenotes the input patterns, and y_(i)ε{−1, 1} denotes the binary labels.The goal for a supervised classifier is to find a function f(x) thathas, at most, E deviation from y_(i) for all the training data, and isas flat as possible. In the training stage, if using SVM, the models canbe built based on different kernel functions and cost ratios of errormargin on positive and negative examples. The SVM classifier is afunction of:

$\begin{matrix}{{f(x)} = {{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{S}\; {a_{i} \cdot {k\left( {x,x_{i}} \right)}}} + b}} & (1) \\{{k\left( {x,x_{i}} \right)}^{- \frac{{{x - x_{i}}}^{2}}{r}}} & (2)\end{matrix}$

where S is the number of support vectors, k(.,.) is a kernel function,e.g., the Gaussian kernel, a_(i) is the weighting of SVs, and b is aconstant threshold value. The goal of SVM is to find a hyperplane whichbest separates training examples with a minimum cost. The kernelfunction can be considered as a distance function between unknownvectors and SVs.

In the distributed system with independent PEs, PEs are required forswitching among various operating points with little overhead. Onesolution is to generate embedded classifiers. For different operatingpoints, the lower complexity classifiers are subsets of high complexityclassifiers without a few parameters' updates. For instance, fromequations (1) and (2), it is known that the complexity of SVM-basedclassifiers depends on the kernel, the feature dimensions and the numberof support vectors. Regardless of the storage and I/O accessrequirements, if the complexity c as the number of operations(multiplications, additions) required for classification is considered,then the resource needed for such computation is:

c∝S·D  (3)

where D is the dimensionality of the feature vector, and S is the numberof support vectors.

The PE achieves various operating points of the C-A curve by controllingthe number of features to extract and the number of support vectors bysetting unneeded SVs to zero. In the embodiments of the presentinvention, models are assumed to have been only trained once withoutresource constraint consideration or models may be provided bythird-party provider. Thus, the system can only generate these C-Acurves based on existing classifiers. Four methods are used to determinethese curves: selecting n SVs with n max a_(i), [a_(i)], randomselection, or clustering on SVs. The first three methods are embeddedclassifiers, while the fourth method is not. Operation points aredetermined by off-line training using a validation set.

If training samples are available, the system may use other methods withpre-determined thresholds on SVs and error margin, v-SVM, see, forexample, B. Scholkopf et al., “New Support Vector Algorithms,”NC2-TR-1998-031, November 1998. However, this causes additional systemI/O load while switching between different operating points.

A 62-hour development set may be used, which has been manually annotatedwith 133 audio and video concepts, see for example, C.-Y. Lin et al., B.L. Tseng et al., “Video Collaborative Annotation Forum: EstablishingGround-Truth Labels on Large Multimedia Datasets,” NIST TRECVIDWorkshop, MD, November 2003. This set was divided into four parts: CR(38 hrs), CV (6 hr), CF1 (6 hr) and CF2 (12 hr). As in A. Amir, et al.,visual models are trained using the CR set, and the modeling parametersare selected using the CV set. The models are then tested on the unseenCF1 and CF2 sets. Note that the manual annotation of CF1 and CF2 sets isonly used for measuring the system performance. The Average Precision(AP) value is used, which is the integral area under theprecision-recall curve to measure the accuracy. AP is usually used byNIST to provide a single-value metric of the P-R curve. Mean AveragePrecision (MAP) is used by averaging the AP values of a system acrossall testing concepts, see, for example, A. Amir, et al., to compare theperformance of systems.

The 576-dimensional CDS feature vectors of the 28,055 keyframes in theCR set are used for training. Each visual concept is trainedindependently. Positive examples of a training set are selected, if ashot is annotated with this label or any children label in thehierarchical semantic tree, see, for example, C.-Y. Lin et al. All othershots are considered as negative. The negative examples are sub-sampledby a constraint of maximum negative-positive ratio of 5:1. For eachconcept, 9 models of a hybrid of 3 different kernels (linear,polynomial, and Gaussian) and 3 cost functions (1, 10, and 100) aretrained.

A performance comparison between the new models of the present inventionand the IBM 2003 visual concept models is shown in FIG. 3. The IBMvisual concept models were fused with the speech-based detectors to formthe IBM multi-modality detectors that performed best in the TRECVID2003, see, for example, A. Amir, et al. In 2003, 42 visual models wereinternally extensively evaluated using the CF2 set, with a MAP of0.1404. The MAP of the corresponding 42 models based on the new CDSfeatures is 0.1705, which is 21.48% better. If the 13 visual detectorsspecified by NIST were only considered, the gain of MAP values is 23.6%(0.2091 vs. 0.1692).

FIGS. 4 and 5 show the complexity-accuracy curves of some preliminaryexperiments for an embodiment of the present invention. In both cases,classifiers are all embedded, thus, only simple coefficient masking isused in the run-time system operations. In FIG. 4, it is shown that ifthe dimensionality of feature vectors is reduced, the AP of a classifiervaries. For example, if the system operates at 22% of the originalresources (in terms of time and storage), then it may achieve an AP of0.658, which is 83% of the best accuracy. For each complexity value,there may be several accuracy points available due to different featuredimension reduction techniques. In the above case, the operating pointwas selected with the feature values from all 3 slices, 1 set of colorhistograms (i.e., gray-level) and 2 sets of textures (i.e., 1 DChistogram and 1 AC histogram).

In FIG. 5 an example of the accuracy-complexity curve based on thereduction of number of SVs is shown. This model has 440 SVs, and with50% of the SVs, the classifier achieves 86.6% of the original accuracy.Similarly, there could be several operating points for each reductionratio.

Referring now to FIG. 6, a block diagram illustrates an exemplaryhardware implementation of a computing system in accordance with whichone or more components/methodologies of the invention (e.g.,components/methodologies described in the context of FIGS. 1-3) may beimplemented, according to an embodiment of the present invention.

As shown, the computer system may be implemented in accordance with aprocessor 610, a memory 612, I/O devices 614, and a network interface616, coupled via a computer bus 618 or alternate connection arrangement.

It is to be appreciated that the term “processor” as used herein isintended to include any processing device, such as, for example, onethat includes a CPU (central processing unit) and/or other processingcircuitry. It is also to be understood that the term “processor” mayrefer to more than one processing device and that various elementsassociated with a processing device may be shared by other processingdevices.

The term “memory” as used herein is intended to include memoryassociated with a processor or CPU, such as, for example, RAM, ROM, afixed memory device (e.g., hard drive), a removable memory device (e.g.,diskette), flash memory, etc.

In addition, the phrase “input/output devices” or “I/O devices” as usedherein is intended to include, for example, one or more input devices(e.g., keyboard, mouse, etc.) for entering data to the processing unit,and/or one or more output devices (e.g., speaker, display, printer,etc.) for presenting results associated with the processing unit.

Still further, the phrase “network interface” as used herein is intendedto include, for example, one or more transceivers to permit the computersystem to communicate with another computer system via an appropriatecommunications protocol.

A novel semantic filtering system for large-scale video monitoring andreducing the amount of transmission loads is provided by the embodimentsof the present invention. A set of novel visual features, which resultsin significant gains in both speed and accuracy, has also been provided.

Although illustrative embodiments of the present invention have beendescribed herein with reference to the accompanying drawings, it is tobe understood that the invention is not limited to those preciseembodiments, and that various other changes and modifications may bemade by one skilled in the art without departing from the scope orspirit of the invention.

1. A method of filtering video packets for video stream monitoringcomprising the steps of: receiving a video packet of a video stream;extracting one or more features from a specified frame of the videopacket via one or more histograms and frequency domain coefficients ofthe specified frame; implementing one or more concept detectors on theone or more features creating one or more confidence values; andtransmitting the confidence values to a display module for filtering ofvideo packets.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein, in the step ofextracting one or more features, the one or more features comprisecompressed-domain slice features.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein thestep of implementing one or more concept detectors comprises the step ofmatching user interests with a confidence output of semantic modelvectors.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of transmitting theconfidence values comprises the steps of: storing the confidence valuesas metadata; and transmitting the metadata to the display module forfiltering of video packets.
 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the stepof extracting one or more features comprises the steps of: parsing thevideo packet to attain a specified frame; calculating a histogram foreach of one or more slices of the specified frame using frequency domaincoefficients of the specified frame; and creating a feature vector ofthe specified frame based on the one or more calculated histograms. 6.The method of claim 5, wherein the step of calculating a histogramcomprises the steps of: determining frequency domain coefficients of thespecified frame; partitioning the specified frame into one or moreslices; and calculating a histogram of the frequency domain coefficientsfor each of the one or more slices of the specified frame.
 7. The methodof claim 6, further comprising the step of truncating selected frequencydomain coefficients in each of the one or more slices of the specifiedframe.
 8. The method of claim 6, wherein the step of determiningfrequency domain coefficients comprises the step of mapping a datacompression coding scheme to frequency domain coefficients of thespecified frame.
 9. The method of claim 8, wherein, in the step ofmapping a data compression coding scheme, the data compression codingscheme comprises variable length codes.
 10. The method of claim 8,wherein, in the step of mapping a data compression coding scheme, thefrequency domain coefficients comprise discrete cosine transformcoefficients.
 11. The method of claim 6, wherein the step of calculatinga histogram comprises the steps of using a DC coefficient and one ormore AC coefficients of the discrete cosine transformation coefficientson each color plane.
 12. The method of claim 11, wherein, in the step ofusing a DC coefficient and one or more AC coefficients, the one or moreAC coefficients comprise two lowest frequency AC coefficients.
 13. Amethod of extracting features from video packets for filtering purposescomprising the steps of: parsing a video packet to attain a specifiedframe; calculating a histogram for each of one or more slices of thespecified frame using frequency domain coefficients of the specifiedframe; and creating a feature vector of the specified frame based on theone or more calculated histograms.
 14. A method of calculating one ormore histograms for feature extraction from a video packet, comprisingthe steps of: determining frequency domain coefficients of a specifiedframe of the video packet; partitioning the specified frame into one ormore slices; and calculating a histogram of the frequency domaincoefficients for each of the one or more slices of the specified frame.15. Apparatus for filtering video packets for video stream monitoring,comprising: a memory; and at least one processor coupled to the memoryand operative to: receive a video packet of a video stream; extract oneor more features from a specified frame of the video packet via one ormore histograms and frequency domain coefficients of the specifiedframe; implement one or more concept detectors on the one or morefeatures creating one or more confidence values; and transmit theconfidence values to a display module for filtering of video packets.16. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein, in the operation of extractingone or more features, the one or more features comprisecompressed-domain slice features.
 17. The apparatus of claim 15, whereinthe operation of implementing one or more concept detectors comprisesthe operation of matching user interests with a confidence output ofsemantic model vectors.
 18. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein theoperation of transmitting the confidence values comprises the operationsof: storing the confidence values as metadata; and transmitting themetadata to the display module for filtering of video packets.
 19. Theapparatus of claim 15, wherein the operation of extracting one or morefeatures comprises the operations of: parsing the video packet to attaina specified frame; calculating a histogram for each of one or moreslices of the specified frame using frequency domain coefficients of thespecified frame; and creating a feature vector of the specified framebased on the one or more calculated histograms.
 20. The apparatus ofclaim 19, wherein the operation of calculating a histogram comprises theoperations of: determining frequency domain coefficients of thespecified frame; partitioning the specified frame into one or moreslices; and calculating a histogram of the frequency domain coefficientsfor each of the one or more slices of the specified frame.
 21. Theapparatus of claim 20, further comprising the operation of truncatingselected frequency domain coefficients in each of the one or more slicesof the specified frame.
 22. The apparatus of claim 20, wherein theoperation of determining frequency domain coefficients comprises thestep of mapping a data compression coding scheme to frequency domaincoefficients of the specified frame.
 23. The apparatus of claim 22,wherein, in the operation of mapping a data compression coding scheme,the data compression coding scheme comprises variable length codes. 24.The apparatus of claim 22, wherein, in the operation of mapping a datacompression coding scheme, the frequency domain coefficients comprisediscrete cosine transform coefficients.
 25. The apparatus of claim 20,wherein the operation of calculating a histogram comprises the steps ofusing a DC coefficient and one or more AC coefficients of the discretecosine transformation coefficients on each color plane.
 26. Theapparatus of claim 25, wherein, in the operation of using a DCcoefficient and one or more AC coefficients, the one or more ACcoefficients comprise two lowest frequency AC coefficients.
 27. Anarticle of manufacture for filtering video packets for video streammonitoring, comprising a machine readable medium containing one or moreprograms which when executed implement the steps of: receiving a videopacket of a video stream; extracting one or more features from aspecified frame of the video packet via one or more histograms andfrequency domain coefficients of the specified frame; implementing oneor more concept detectors on the one or more features creating one ormore confidence values; and transmitting the confidence values to adisplay module for filtering of video packets.
 28. The article ofmanufacture of claim 27, wherein the step of extracting one or morefeatures comprises the steps of: parsing the video packet to attain aspecified frame; calculating a histogram for each of one or more slicesof the specified frame using frequency domain coefficients of thespecified frame; and creating a feature vector of the specified framebased on the one or more calculated histograms.
 29. The article ofmanufacture of claim 28, wherein the step of calculating a histogramcomprises the steps of: determining frequency domain coefficients of thespecified frame; partitioning the specified frame into one or moreslices; and calculating a histogram of the frequency domain coefficientsfor each of the one or more slices of the specified frame.